B4.0 Results of the First and Second Quantitative Analysis Attempts

      By comparing Figures B-1 and B-2, the following is clear:

For the first attempt, the number of Technique 1 complexes grows from 0 to a maximum number and then stabilizes at 1 as OV increases from 0° to the DOC. For the second attempt, the number of Technique 2 complexes starts at a maximum of 9 and decreases monatomically to 1 as OV increases from 0° to the DOC. The DOC is the same in both cases.

     The detailed results of the two analysis attempts are presented at the end of this appendix, and are organized into chapters of this appendix as follows:

Chapter I addresses Technique 1 Complexes and Technique 2 Complexes. There are three Subchapters (I.1, I.2, and I.3), one Subchapter for each of the three groups of High PHENOMENON, Medium PHENOMENON, Low PHENOMENON. Each Subchapter has five pages. Page 1 is tabular data. It gives: The degree of closure (DOC). The maximum number of Techniques 1 Complexes. The maximum number of Techniques 2 Complexes. It is important to note that resolution for OV for the second attempt dealing with Technique 2 complexes was .1°. So the maximum possible number of Technique 2 Complexes is just the number of complexes that manifest when OV = .1°, whereas by definition the maximum number of Technique 2 complexes for OV exactly equal to 0° is 9. The mean, the standard deviation, the median, and the number of orb values for each of three sets of orbs: Set 1 All of the orb values. (There is one orb value for each of the 36 planetary pairs.) Set 2 All of the orb values that are less than 10°. Set 3 All of the orb values that are greater than or equal to 10°. Note that "Max" means the maximum orb value of the 36 orbs. The mean, the standard deviation, the median, and the range of values for all of the variables mentioned above when the entire group (i.e., High, Medium, or Low) is considered all together. Pages 2, 3, 4, and 5 present scatter plots of the data on page 1, wherein each row on page 1 is taken as a data component. In other words, pages 2, 3, 4, and 5 are not involved with the overall statistical data at the bottom of page 1. Page 2 gives plots of the Degree of Closure (DOC) versus: The maximum number of Technique 1 Complexes. The maximum number of Technique 2 Complexes. Page 3 gives plots of the DOC versus: Mean of all orbs. Standard deviation of all orbs. Median of all orbs. Page 4 gives plots of the DOC versus: Mean of orbs for orb values less than 10°. Standard deviation of orbs for orb values less than 10°. Median of orbs for orb values less than 10°. Page 5 gives plots of the DOC versus: Mean of orbs for orb values greater than or equal to 10°. Standard deviation of orb values for orb values greater than or equal to 10°. Median of orb values for orb values greater than or equal to 10°. Of all the data in Chapter I, the only interesting thing vis-a-vis distinguishing between the three PHENOMENON groups is the maximum number of Technique 2 Complexes. This can be seen by examining the fifth column of each of the three data tables in the three Subchapters. For the High group, there are three 7s, ten 8s, and two 9s. For the Medium group, there are two 7s, seven 8s, and nine 9s. For the Low group, there is one 8, and twenty-six 9s. In terms of percentages: High 2 out of 15 or 13.3% are 9s 10 out of 15 or 66.7% are 8s 3 out of 15 or 20.0% are 7s Medium 9 out of 18 or 50.0% are 9s 7 out of 18 or 38.9% are 8s 2 out of 18 or 11.1% are 7s Low 26 out of 27 or 96.3% are 9s 1 out of 27 or 3.7% are 8s 0 out of 27 or 0.0% are 7s These data are plotted in Figure B-3. It appears as if there may be a correlation between the level of the PHENOMENON that manifests and the propensity of a geocentric planetary configuration to form complexes at very low orb values. Remember that the maximum number of Technique 2 Complexes is the number of complexes that form at OV = .1°. Chapter II - Addresses Technique 1 Complexes. There are four Subchapters (II.1, II.2, II.3, and II.4). In each Subchapter, plots are given. Subchapter II.1 Page 1 presents plots of orb (or more properly orb variable, OV) versus the mean of the number of Technique 1 Complexes. There is one mean curve for each of the three groups of High, Medium, and Low. Page 2 is the same as page 1 except that on page 2, median date is plotted. Pages 3 through 7 present the mean and median data plotted on pages 1 and 2. Subchapters II.2, II.3, and II.4 present curves of orb versus the number of Technique 1 Complexes for High, Medium, and Low, respectively, (i.e., II.2 is for High, II.3 is for Medium, and II.4 is for Low.) The following is presented in each of these Subchapters: A curve for each member of the group. A curve for the mean of the group. Note that it is these mean curves (i.e., one from each of Subchapters II.2, II.3, and II.4) that are presented all together on page 1 of Subchapter II.1. Chapter III - Addresses Technique 2 Complexes. The organization and format of the data presented in Chapter III is identical to that presented in Chapter II. The data in Chapter III is for Technique 2 Complexes. The data presented in Chapters II and III is not particularly impressive in terms of showing differences between the three groups of High, Medium, and Low, but there are some indications of group differences in the data. This can be seen in Figures B-4 and B-5. Figure B-4 is a reproduction of Page 1 from Subchapter II.1. It presents OV versus the mean number of Technique 1 Complexes for each of the three groups. The curves demonstrate the tendency for more Technique 1 Complex activity for High than for Medium and more for Medium than for Low. "Technique 1 Complex activity" means that complexes form at lower OV values, fewer numbers of complexes form as OV increases, and the coalescing of the individual complexes into one complex happens at a low value of OV. Figure B-5 is a reproduction of Page 1 from Subchapter III.1. It presents OV versus the mean number of Technique 2 Complexes for each of the three groups. In general, the High curve falls below the Medium and Low curves. This indicates that Technique 2 complexes have more of a tendency to form and coalesce together at low OV values for the High group than for the Medium and Low groups.